Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.
Stablecoins have come a long way since they first popped up. Now, they are moving steadily into the mainstream as both an everyday payment tool and a dependable store of value, filling in where traditional currencies fall short. According to market data, total stablecoins transaction volume topped $15.6 trillion in 2024, surpassing the amounts processed by Visa. Established financial institutions like PayPal, JPMorgan, and even Visa itself have noticed this shift and are eager to incorporate stablecoins into their services. With the total stablecoin market cap now over $230 billion, it’s tempting to think that they’re unstoppable.
Yet, there’s a major sticking point preventing stablecoins from reaching their next milestone: the lack of privacy. At present, each transaction—be it USD Coin (USDC), Tether (USDT), or a newer alternative—can be seen on a public ledger. Anyone can track how much was sent, when it was sent, and the addresses of everyone involved. This transparency is aligned with the spirit of open blockchain networks, but in practice, it presents significant risks for both everyday users and large organizations.
I’ve spent years working on privacy solutions in the blockchain world, and I’ve watched stablecoins soar without resolving the privacy challenge that undermines them. Individuals who make on-chain transactions reveal a lot about themselves without even realizing it. Their purchase history, trading patterns, and even relationships with other wallets are all out in the open.
Businesses and institutions face an even worse headache. Competitive data, like payroll information and supplier details, is exposed on a public network, which is unacceptable in traditional finance. You’re paying a contractor on-chain, then suddenly realize that your closest competitors can see exactly how much you’re spending. It’s a pretty uncomfortable scenario that keeps many enterprises from embracing stablecoins despite their advantages.
The transparency dilemma
Privacy isn’t a gimmick. In conventional banking, transactions happen behind closed doors, with checks and balances in place to meet legal requirements. You don’t see your neighbor’s mortgage balance or your competitor’s entire payroll by peeking into their bank statements. With most stablecoins, on the other hand, a simple blockchain explorer can reveal anyone’s transaction history. That level of openness is pretty unusual in the financial world, and it’s a big concern.
Consider how transparency affects users’ sense of security and autonomy. If you’re sending funds to a friend, you might be comfortable sharing that you made a payment but not necessarily the entire history of your finances. By mapping out your on-chain activity, a third party can identify your spending habits, personal interests, and business relationships. This surveillance potential worries regulators, too, as it sets criminals and law-abiding citizens in the same fully visible system, using intrusive methods to separate them.
The way financial rules are designed now doesn’t really account for public ledgers. Regulators obviously want to keep an eye on illicit activities, but they also get that everyday transactions shouldn’t be a public record. Right now, the regulatory push-and-pull around stablecoins has created uncertainty, with the UK delaying formal guidelines and the European Commission examining how to protect users while still encouraging progress. Meanwhile, in the U.S., officials see stablecoins as a way to strengthen the dollar’s global position. Yet, this huge potential is overshadowed by a major question: how do we ensure strong user protections without turning every payment into a public record?
Why businesses and regulators need confidential stablecoins
For enterprises, stablecoins could be a game-changer. They’re fast, predictable, and easy to handle across borders. However, serious businesses also expect confidentiality—especially if they’re dealing with payroll, sensitive invoices, or supply chain transactions. When these details are made public, it puts organizations in a vulnerable position. Competitive leaks, reputational risks, and potential hacking threats become part of the equation.
Institutional adoption depends on striking a balance. Regulators must have sufficient oversight to curb criminal activities, and corporations need privacy protections that parallel traditional finance. Without confidentiality, stablecoins will remain an experimental tool rather than a serious contender for the daily flow of corporate funds. Many are wary of adopting a payment method that effectively publishes their internal operations, even if the system works seamlessly otherwise.
Privacy, therefore, isn’t just a personal preference—it’s a strategic need. When we talk about stablecoins becoming the next digital dollar, we mean a currency that holds its value against fiat and is readily accepted worldwide. That’s a tall order if privacy is missing from the core design. If stablecoins want to outshine legacy payment systems, they have to address the real-world concerns of the people who use them most—corporations, large institutions, and individuals who simply value discretion.
ZK technology: The key to real-world adoption
One promising way forward lies in zero-knowledge proof technology. ZKPs allow someone to prove the validity of a transaction or a statement without revealing the underlying information. It’s not magic, but it’s pretty close. The technology basically shows that a transaction is legitimate—and follows all compliance rules—while keeping the specific details out of public view.
For example, if a large manufacturer wants to use stablecoins for cross-border payments, they can do so with a ZK-enabled platform. The blockchain confirms that the transaction is valid and within legal parameters. Regulators or auditors with the correct permissions can verify compliance. Yet, the manufacturer’s suppliers, payment amounts, and other private data remain hidden from ordinary observers. This is how you can have genuine privacy while still retaining a system that’s fully auditable where it matters.
Archblock’s recent launch of 1USD on a privacy-centric blockchain shows that momentum is growing. These initiatives recognize that transaction confidentiality isn’t just a side feature, it’s a key part of the whole package for mainstream success. And we’ve been following a similar philosophy by building technology that secures on-chain transactions and gives users control over which details get disclosed. Think of it as the next logical step in stablecoin evolution.
Encouragingly, regulators are starting to understand that privacy doesn’t automatically mean wrongdoing. If anything, real privacy can make compliance more efficient because investigators don’t have to sift through endless trivial data. They can rely on cryptographic proofs that confirm all requirements are met. This approach keeps honest users safe from prying eyes and ensures malicious actors have less room to exploit open financial records.
Final thoughts
Stablecoins have already demonstrated that they can process mind-boggling transaction volumes—enough to surpass Visa, one of the world’s largest payment networks. Major financial institutions are backing them for a good reason: they move funds across borders quickly, maintain a stable value, and can be integrated into a vast range of digital services. But there’s a reason many businesses remain hesitant, and it’s not about speed or cost any more. Transparency still looms large, threatening to undermine stablecoins as a truly mainstream form of money.
To me, privacy is the linchpin for stablecoin success. We don’t have to accept a world where using a digital currency means giving up on confidentiality. Traditional finance, after all, has figured out how to keep transaction details hidden from the public view while still meeting regulatory standards, and there’s no reason stablecoins can’t do the same. Zero-knowledge proofs and similar cryptographic methods are already paving the way toward a private, compliant digital dollar.
That’s the future we should be shooting for: a private digital currency that combines blockchain convenience with the trust and discretion we expect in financial dealings. The technology is within reach, and the next step is for the broader industry—developers, institutions, and regulators—to commit to making privacy the norm instead of afterthought. When that happens, stablecoins will truly be ready for prime time, and the idea of a stable, secure digital dollar will transform from a promise to our everyday reality.
